Hello again, yesterday i posted a message that my days of chasing you to help uncover my experiment which WILL end the global energy crisis are over. it was a symbolic day of 666 days from completion of experiment on palm sunday april 2007. it is the final leg of a life journey in which i have carried a message of god for ten years- a solution to HIV for ten years to a deaf ear- a solution of energy since 2003 to a deaf ear- and without question 666 days of a constant DAILY attempt to provoke you to help. my initial days were polite and sincere as my life has been- no question my disgust and anger has come since summer 07 as i understand I am true in world where 25,000 children die each day from a weak world of energy and YOU ignore and care only for your own child.
my blog statement this morning went like this-
I run when you chase
It is clear when one chases another with devotion and love in an initial encounter between potential lovers or friends- the one with attention and drive for communication is ignored as the chasee believes this too good to be true and runs away from the chaser trying to help them-
The same has now applied with me and my energy device- for 22 straight months DAILY i have provoke and begged and tried to the best of my abilities to make friends to help me uncover my very dangerous experiment- ALL ran away for whatever reasons- now I will stop and let YOU do the chasing- the reason why you will soon- the global economy dies of energy and will continue to do so, even the new american president asks daily for HOPE in people to find that change- be that change-To find ENERGY- and soon when all is destroyed in world economy and increasing wars over ENERGY will people remove their head from their ass and SEEK the solution-
You will find my deeds as I have solved the global energy crisis- time will tell
and so now is day 667
I LOVE GOD- look how wonderful the heavens work- i find a video tape this morning 20 years old-this is a practice speech for a class at calpoly in 1989- my topic i chose was Drakes equation- the first scientific approach to estimating the total number of advanced civilizations in the universe- after my speech in class- the only question posed was by the professor himself- he looked at me with a very lonely look and said " where is god in all of this" - I had no answer for him- for drakes equation and science of 20th century does not care to give such an account- it is cold and heartless- TODAY-MY MESSAGE as a scientists who brings earth the solution to the energy crisis is for ALL SCIENTISTS and secular evolutionary s- you are to declare Christ as king as the way and the truth and the life- God is great- let all the children of the earth begin to unify under this common banner- I am the messenger---
*******************************************************************************************
Frank Drake formulated his equation in 1960 in preparation for the Green Bank meeting. This meeting, held at Green Bank, West Virginia, established SETI as a scientific discipline. The historic meeting, whose participants became known as the "Order of the Dolphin," brought together leading astronomers, physicists, biologists, social scientists, and industry leaders to discuss the possibility of detecting intelligent life among the stars.
The Green Bank meeting was also remarkable because it featured the first use of the famous formula that came to be known as the "Drake Equation". This explains why the equation is also known by its other names with the "Green Bank" designation. When Drake came up with this formula, he had no notion that it would become a staple of SETI theorists for decades to come. In fact, he thought of it as an organizational tool — a way to order the different issues to be discussed at the Green Bank conference, and bring them to bear on the central question of intelligent life in the universe. Carl Sagan, a great proponent of SETI, utilized and quoted the formula often and as a result the formula is often mislabeled as "The Sagan Equation". The Green Bank Meeting was commemorated by a plaque.
The Drake equation is closely related to the Fermi paradox in that Drake suggested that a large number of extraterrestrial civilizations would form, but that the lack of evidence of such civilizations (the Fermi paradox) suggests that technological civilizations tend to destroy themselves rather quickly. This theory often stimulates an interest in identifying and publicizing ways in which humanity could destroy itself, and then countered with hopes of avoiding such destruction and eventually becoming a space-faring species. A similar argument is The Great Filter,[1] which notes that since there are no observed extraterrestrial civilizations, despite the vast number of stars, then some step in the process must be acting as a filter to reduce the final value. According to this view, either it is very hard for intelligent life to arise, or the lifetime of such civilizations must be depressingly short.
The grand question of the number of communicating civilizations in our galaxy could, in Drake's view, be reduced to seven smaller issues with his equation.The Drake equation states that:
N = R^{\ast} \times f_p \times n_e \times f_{\ell} \times f_i \times f_c \times L \!
where:
N is the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible;
and
R* is the average rate of star formation in our galaxy
fp is the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne is the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
fℓ is the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
fi is the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
fc is the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L is the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space.
[edit] Alternative expression
The number of stars in the galaxy now, N*, is related to the star formation rate R* by
N^{\ast} = \int_0^{T_g} R^{\ast}(t) dt , \,\!,
where Tg is the age of the galaxy. Assuming for simplicity that R* is constant, then N^{\ast} = R^{\ast} \times T_g and the Drake equation can be rewritten into an alternate form phrased in terms of the more easily observable value, N*.[2]
N = N^{\ast} \times f_p \times n_e \times f_{\ell} \times f_i \times f_c \times L / T_g \,\!
[edit] R factor
One can question why the number of civilizations should be proportional to the star formation rate, though this makes technical sense. (The product of all the terms except L tells how many new communicating civilizations are born each year. Then you multiply by the lifetime to get the expected number. For example, if an average of 0.01 new civilizations are born each year, and they each last 500 years on the average, then on the average 5 will exist at any time.) The original Drake Equation can be extended to a more realistic model, where the equation uses not the number of stars that are forming now, but those that were forming several billion years ago. The alternate formulation, in terms of the number of stars in the galaxy, is easier to explain and understand, but implicitly assumes the star formation rate is constant over the life of the galaxy.
***************************************************************************************************
TO A WORLD that prays to god- or believes in advanced entities- I am the messenger- YOU will never ever understand me until you have FAITH and uncover my experiment for ENERGY- one in which an American president screams for each day-
Find it soon and many live- ignore as has been- and global economy shall be destroyed by mans need for energy and its own willingness to kill one another for life to its own nation-
I bring a gift
No comments:
Post a Comment